Moore v. Verdesian Life Sciences US, LLC

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by October 18, 2017, defendant shall file an amended notice of removal that shall allege facts establishing the citizenship of each of the defendant LLC's members. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if d efendant does not timely and fully comply with this order, this matter will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other proceedings in this case are STAYED pending further order of this Court. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/27/2017. (JMC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION SULAYMAN MOORE, Plaintiff, v. VERDESIAN LIFE SCIENCES US, LLC, f/k/a QC CORPORATION Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-CV-167-SNLJ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on review of the file following assignment to the undersigned. The Eight Circuit has admonished district courts to “be attentive to a satisfaction of jurisdictional requirements in all cases.” Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 823 F.2d 214, 216 (8th Cir. 1987). “In every federal case the court must be satisfied that it has jurisdiction before it turns to the merits of other legal arguments.” Carlson v. Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc., 445 F.3d 1046, 1050 (8th Cir. 2006). “A plaintiff who seeks to invoke diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts must plead citizenship distinctly and affirmatively.” 15 James Wm. Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 102.31 (3d ed. 2010). Because this action has been removed from state court to this Court, the party seeking to invoke diversity jurisdiction is the defendant; however, the party seeking removal has burden of establishing federal subject matter jurisdiction. In re Business Men’s Assur. Co. of America, 992 F.2d 181, 183 (8th Cir. 1993). The Notice of Removal (#1) asserts that the Court has jurisdiction over the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the lawsuit is between citizens of different states and the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000. The Petition alleges that defendant “Verdesian Life Sciences, U.S., LLC f/k/a QC Corporation [hereafter VLS] is a foreign for-profit international corporation doing business in the State of Missouri with a facility located at 5366 Nash Road, Cape Girardeau, Missouri.” The Eighth Circuit has held that limited liability companies are citizens of every state of which any member is a citizen. See GMAC Commercial Credit, LLC v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 357 F.3d 827, 829 (8th Cir. 2004). Thus, the Court must examine the citizenship of each member of defendant, a limited liability company, to determine whether diversity jurisdiction exists. Although the Notice states that defendant’s “sole member is Verdesian Life Sciences, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware,” that information is insufficient for the Court to examine the citizenship of each member of defendant. This Court is also required to examine the parties for any potential conflicts of interest that the undersigned might possess. See 28 U.S.C. § 455. Because it is the defendant’s burden in this case to establish subject matter jurisdiction, In re Business Men’s Assur. Co. of America, 992 F.2d at 183, the Court will grant defendant twenty-one (21) days to file an amended notice of removal that alleges facts showing the existence of the required diversity of citizenship of the parties. If defendant fails to timely and fully comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this matter without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by October 18, 2017, defendant shall file an amended notice of removal that shall allege facts establishing the citizenship of each of the defendant LLC’s members. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if defendant does not timely and fully comply with this order, this matter will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other proceedings in this case are STAYED pending further order of this Court. Dated this 27th day of September, 2017. _____________________________________ STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?