Barnes v. Chandler et al
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF No. 2) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 21 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, Plaintiff shall either pay the $405 filing fee in full or file a fully completed Application to Proceed in D istrict Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs that is accompanied by a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at the Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. ( Response to Court due by 1/15/2025.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 1/29/2025. (JMC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
DAMETRICE BARNES,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
SETH CHANDLER, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 1:25-cv-00012-PLC
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon review of Missouri prisoner Dametrice Barnes’s
Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (ECF No. 2). A litigant
seeking leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee is required to file an affidavit stating his
assets, his inability to pay, and the nature of the action. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). If the litigant is a
prisoner he must also file a “certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional
equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the
complaint . . . obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was
confined.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The district court must use that account statement to calculate
the initial partial filing fee the prisoner must pay, and then “assess and, when funds exist, collect,
as a partial payment of any court fees required by law, an initial partial filing fee” of twenty percent
of whichever amount is greater, the average monthly deposits or the average monthly balance. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A)–(B).
Plaintiff has filed the required affidavit, but he failed to file a certified copy of his account
statement—or institutional equivalent—as required by section 1915(a)(2). As courts consistently
note, Congress wrote section 1915 in mandatory terms. See, e.g., Samarripa v. Ormond, 917 F.3d
515, 521 (6th Cir. 2019); Edwards v. Neb. Dep’t of Corr., 8:23-cv-0002- JFB, 2023 WL 2186984,
at *1 (D. Neb. Feb. 23, 2023); Aikens v. Osorio, 3:22-cv-00312- MR, 2022 WL 3590349, at *1
(W.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2022); Ortega v. Phaneof, 1:19-cv-00893-JB, 2020 WL 4529334, at *1
(D.N.M. Apr. 8, 2020). Based on the plain text of § 1915, without Plaintiff’s account statement,
the Court cannot grant his Application. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), (b)(1).
The Court will deny Plaintiff’s Application without prejudice. The Court grants Plaintiff
21 days to either pay the $405 filing fee in its entirety or file an application that complies with
all of section 1915(a)’s requirements. If Plaintiff files an application in full compliance with §
1915(a) and the Court grants it, the Court will assess an initial partial filing fee and order
Plaintiff to pay it.
Plaintiff has also filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 3). “A
pro se litigant has no statutory or constitutional right to have counsel appointed in a civil case.”
Stevens v. Redwing, 146 F.3d 538, 546 (8th Cir. 1998). When determining whether to appoint
counsel for an indigent litigant, the Court considers factors such as the complexity of the case, the
ability of the pro se litigant to investigate the facts, the existence of conflicting testimony, and the
ability of the pro se litigant to present his claims. Id. After considering the relevant factors, the
Court finds that the appointment of counsel is unwarranted. However, recognizing that
circumstances may change, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion without prejudice, and will
entertain future motions for the appointment of counsel, if appropriate.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court
Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF No. 2) is DENIED without prejudice.
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF
No. 3) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 21 days of the date of this Memorandum and
Order, Plaintiff shall either pay the $405 filing fee in full or file a fully completed Application to
Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs that is accompanied by a certified copy
of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 6-month period immediately
preceding the filing of the complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of the
Court’s form Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs.
PATRICIA L. COHEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dated this 29th day of January, 2025
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?