Clark v. Lombardi
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants Ventura, Street, and Barone to limit the deposition fees Plaintiff's experts may charge these Defendants is GRANTED in part, to the extent set forth above. (Doc. No. 112.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/12/2012. (NCL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
GEORGE LOMBARDI, et al.,
No. 2:10CV00066 AGF
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff Aaron Clark, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pro se on October
20, 2010, claiming that while he was an inmate in the custody of the Missouri
Department of Corrections (“MDOC”), his constitutional rights were violated due to
Defendants’ indifference to a serious spinal cord injury he sustained, resulting in
permanent lower body paralysis. On November 19, 2010, counsel was appointed to
represent him. Now before the Court is the motion of three Defendants (Carmen
Ventura, Stanley Street, and Jay Barone) to limit the fees that three of Plaintiff’s experts
may charge these Defendants for taking the experts’ depositions.
Psychiatrist David Folks, M.D.’s deposition charge is a minimum of $3,000 for a
deposition of up to four-hours, and $5,000 for an eight-hour deposition, while his charge
to Plaintiff for record review, conferences, and consultation is $375 per hour. Plaintiff’s
nursing expert, Steven Scott, R.N., charges Plaintiff $110 per hour for chart review and
court time; and $1,500 minimum for depositions up to eight hours. And neurosurgeon
Robert Spiro, M.D., charges plaintiff $1,000 per hour for consultation or meetings,
$5,000 for records review of less than four hours, and $4,000 per hour for depositions.
The moving Defendants argue that the fees that they are charged per hour for the
depositions of Plaintiff’s experts should be limited to the amounts that these experts
charge Plaintiff for the same hour of their time for records review and consultations, or
alternatively, for a Court order that the parties pay for their own expert witnesses’
Plaintiff responds that all of their experts’ fees are reasonable. With respect to
Drs. Folks and Spiro, Plaintiff explains they will be unable to schedule patients for the
full morning or full afternoon of their depositions and are entitled to be compensated for
the resulting loss of income. Plaintiff also maintains that it is reasonable for an expert’s
deposition fee to be higher than the fee for records review, as records review can be done
between patients or during non-office hours.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4)(C), a party seeking an opposing
expert’s deposition shall pay the expert “a reasonable fee.” Courts “must be on guard
against exorbitant expert fees, and retain the ultimate responsibility to keep litigation
costs from becoming unreasonable.” Massasoit v. Carter, 227 F.R.D. 264, 267 (D.N.C.
2005) (citing Edin v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co.,188 F.R.D. 543, 547 (D. Ariz. 1999)); see
also Norman v. City of Lorain, Ohio, No. 1:04 CV 913, 2006 WL 5249724, at *6 (N.D.
Ohio Nov. 16, 2006).
Upon review of the record, the Court concludes that it is not unreasonable for
practicing medical experts to charge less for document review or consultation, which can
be done in between seeing patients or at home, than for depositions, which cannot. The
Court also believes that within certain bounds, it may be reasonable for practicing
medical personnel to have a minimum charge for a deposition, rather than an hourly rate.
The Court concludes, however that there is no basis for Nurse Scott to charge more for
deposition time than for court time. As such, his deposition fee to Defendants shall be
limited to $110 per hour.
The Court also finds that Dr. Folks’s charges appear excessive and are not
supported by evidence, such as the prevailing rates for other comparable experts. His fee
shall therefor be limited to $550 per hour, with a minimum of $2,000 for a half day. For
similar reasons, the Court finds that Dr. Spiro’s deposition charge of $4,000 per hour is
unreasonable and shall be limited to $2,000 per hour.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants Ventura, Street, and
Barone to limit the deposition fees Plaintiff’s experts may charge these Defendants is
GRANTED in part, to the extent set forth above. (Doc. No. 112.)
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 12th day of December, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?