Young v. Astrue

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation in it entirety. The Social Security Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's claims for benefits is affirmed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Evelynn Young disability benefits is AFFIRMED, and the Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on March 5, 2013. (MCB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION EVELYNN YOUNG, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:11CV0097 ERW (SPM) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Shirley Padmore Mensah [ECF No. 24], pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The Court notes that no objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation within the time period afforded by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation, and hereby sustains, adopts, and incorporates herein the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Social Security Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s claims for benefits is affirmed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Evelynn Young disability benefits is AFFIRMED, and the Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Dated this 5th day of March, 2013. E. RICHARD WEBBER SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?