Shields v. Astrue

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/4/2014. (NCL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION JONATHAN E. SHIELDS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13CV0004 AGF/TCM MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert III, to whom this matter was referred for recommended disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On January 29, 2014, Magistrate Judge Mummert filed his Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court reverse and remand the decision of the Administrative Law Judge to deny Plaintiff supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act and disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the Administrative Law Judge’s decision in this matter should be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. _______________________________ AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 4th day of March, 2014. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?