Shields v. Astrue
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/4/2014. (NCL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
NORTHERN DIVISION
JONATHAN E. SHIELDS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:13CV0004 AGF/TCM
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert III, to whom this matter was referred for
recommended disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On January 29, 2014,
Magistrate Judge Mummert filed his Report and Recommendation, recommending that
the Court reverse and remand the decision of the Administrative Law Judge to deny
Plaintiff supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act and
disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Neither party has
filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in
this case, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the
Administrative Law Judge’s decision in this matter should be reversed and remanded for
further proceedings.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein.
A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.
_______________________________
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 4th day of March, 2014.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?