Lonis v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Adelman is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The Commissioner of Social Securitys decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to plaintiff is affirmed. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 8/19/14. (KJS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION CHRISTY L. LONIS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cause No. 2:13 CV 32 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before me on a Report and Recommendation to affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny Plaintiff benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Neither of the parties has filed an objection to this recommendation. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Judge Adelman issued a Report and Recommendation on July 15, 2014 that recommended that the Commissioner’s decision to deny benefits should be affirmed. Judge Adelman found that the Administrative Law Judge’s determination that Plaintiff was not entitled to benefits was supported by substantial evidence in the record. Any objections to Judge Adelman’s Report and Recommendation had to be filed by July 29, 2014. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today’s date. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Adelman is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to Plaintiff is affirmed. _________________________________ RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 19th day of August, 2014. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?