Cole v. Massey et al
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $4.40 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittancepayable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4)that the remittance is for an original proceeding. If plaintiff does not timely pay the fee, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a Prisoner CivilRights Complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff may file an amended complaint on the form within the next thirty (30) days. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah on 2/28/14. (JWD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
NORTHERN DIVISION
WILLIAM K. COLE,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
TYLER J. MASSEY, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 2:14CV0008 SPM
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon the motion of William Cole (registration no.
1002523), an inmate at Jefferson City Correctional Center, for leave to commence this action
without payment of the required filing fee. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds that
plaintiff does not have sufficient funds to pay the entire filing fee and will assess an initial partial
filing fee of $4.40. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Additionally, the Court finds that the complaint
fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, but the Court will give plaintiff an
opportunity to file an amended complaint.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis is
required to pay the full amount of the filing fee. If the prisoner has insufficient funds in his or
her prison account to pay the entire fee, the Court must assess and, when funds exist, collect an
initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of (1) the average monthly deposits in the
prisoner's account, or (2) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account for the prior sixmonth period. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner is required to make
monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's
account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of the prisoner will forward these
monthly payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the prisoner's account exceeds
$10, until the filing fee is fully paid. Id.
Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit and a certified copy of his prison account statement
for the six-month period immediately preceding the submission of his complaint. A review of
plaintiff's account indicates an average monthly deposit of $22.00, and an average monthly
balance of less than $22.00.
Plaintiff has insufficient funds to pay the entire filing fee.
Accordingly, the Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $4.40, which is 20 percent of
plaintiff's average monthly deposit.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court must dismiss a complaint filed in forma
pauperis if the action is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. An action is
frivolous if it Alacks an arguable basis in either law or fact.@ Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319,
328 (1989); Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 31 (1992). An action is malicious if it is
undertaken for the purpose of harassing the named defendants and not for the purpose of
vindicating a cognizable right. Spencer v. Rhodes, 656 F. Supp. 458, 461-63 (E.D.N.C. 1987),
aff=d 826 F.2d 1059 (4th Cir. 1987). A complaint fails to state a claim if it does not plead
Aenough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.@ Bell Atlantic Corp. v.
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007).
The Complaint
Plaintiff brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Named as defendants are the
Moberly Correctional Center (“MCC”), Unknown Massey (Correctional Officer, MCC), and
Unknown Belles (same). Plaintiff alleges, in a wholly conclusory manner, that Massey assaulted
him and that Belles did not protect him. Plaintiff claims that Massey assaulted him in retaliation
-2-
for his having filed grievances against Massey.
Discussion
A suit against MCC is, in effect, a suit against the State of Missouri. The State of
Missouri, however, is absolutely immune from liability under ' 1983. See Will v. Michigan
Dept. of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 63 (1989). As a result, plaintiff’s claim against MCC is
legally frivolous.
The complaint is silent as to whether defendants Massey or Belles are being sued in their
official or individual capacities. Where a Acomplaint is silent about the capacity in which
[plaintiff] is suing defendant, [a district court must] interpret the complaint as including only
official-capacity claims.@ Egerdahl v. Hibbing Community College, 72 F.3d 615, 619 (8th Cir.
1995); Nix v. Norman, 879 F.2d 429, 431 (8th Cir. 1989). Naming a government official in his
or her official capacity is the equivalent of naming the government entity that employs the
official, in this case the State of Missouri. Will v. Michigan Dep=t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58,
71 (1989). A[N]either a State nor its officials acting in their official capacity are >persons= under
' 1983.@ Id. As a result, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as
to defendants Massey and Belles.
Finally, a civil rights complaint must contain enough facts to state a claim as a matter of
law and must not be merely conclusory. Frey v. City of Herculaneum, 44 F.3d 667, 671 (8th Cir.
1995). Plaintiff only alleges that Massey “assaulted” him and that Belles “failed to protect” him.
These are legal conclusions. To state a claim under § 1983, plaintiff must describe the facts of
the assault, such as how it happened and whether plaintiff was injured.
Because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court will allow plaintiff to file an amended
complaint. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this Order to file an amended
complaint. Plaintiff is warned that the filing of an amended complaint replaces the original
-3-
complaint, and claims that are not realleged are deemed abandoned.
E.g., In re Wireless
Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees Litigation, 396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005). In drafting
the amended complaint, plaintiff must describe the facts that led to his injury, and he must state
whether he is suing defendants in their individual capacities, official capacities, or both. If
plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within thirty days, the Court will dismiss this action
without prejudice.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF
No. 2] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $4.40
within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance
payable to “Clerk, United States District Court,” and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his
prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original
proceeding. If plaintiff does not timely pay the fee, the Court will dismiss this action without
prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a Prisoner Civil
Rights Complaint form.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff may file an amended complaint on the form
within the next thirty (30) days. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, the Court will
dismiss this action without prejudice.
Dated this 28th day of February, 2014.
/s/Shirley Padmore Mensah
SHIRLEY PADMORE MENSAH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?