Endicott v. Hurley et al
Filing
12
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motions for extension of time [ECF No. 8 , 10 ] are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to amend judgment [ECF No. 9 ] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/22/15. (KJS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
NORTHERN DIVISION
FRANKLIN G. ENDICOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES HURLEY, et al.,
Defendants,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:14CV107 DDN
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment and motion
for extension of time to file an amended complaint. The motion for reconsideration lacks merit.
However, the Court will allow plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is warned that the
filing of an amended complaint replaces the original complaint, and claims that are not realleged
are deemed abandoned. E.g., In re Wireless Telephone Federal Cost Recovery Fees Litigation,
396 F.3d 922, 928 (8th Cir. 2005). Plaintiff must file his amended complaint no later than
February 27, 2015.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for extension of time [ECF No. 8,
10] are GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to amend judgment [ECF No. 9] is
DENIED.
Dated this 22nd day of January, 2015.
HENRY EDWARD AUTREY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?