Lesley v. Teague et al

Filing 40

OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motions to compel [ECF No. 35] and for extension of time [ECF No. 36] are DENIED. 35 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/7/16. (CLA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION RICHARD W. LESLEY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. MS. JANE DOE TEAGUE, et al., Defendants, No. 2:15CV59 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to compel and motion for extension of time. The motions are denied. The motion to compel is premature because the Court has not authorized discovery. See E.D. Mo. L.R. 16 - 5.01, 16 - 5.04 (discovery in prisoner cases may not take place until Court enters a Case Management Order). The motion for extension of time is moot. Plaintiff is under the impression that defendant Thompson has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. He did not. He filed an answer, which does not require a response. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions to compel [ECF No. 35] and for extension of time [ECF No. 36] are DENIED. Dated this 7th day of January, 2016 ___________________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?