Mongler v. Knight et al

Filing 50

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for clerk's default 45 and the motion to reconsider 48 are denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the answer filed on July 28, 2017 is deemed timely filed with leave of Court. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 8/2/2017. (CBL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT MONGLER, Plaintiff, vs. BRIAN KNIGHT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:17 CV 6 CDP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case is before the Court on two motions. Plaintiff seeks entry of default against certain defendants because those defendants failed to file an answer after I denied their motion to dismiss. In response to that motion, the defendants filed a document arguing that it would be unjust to enter default against them because they inadvertently failed to file an answer, and then they filed their answer, but failed to seek leave of Court to do so. One defendant also filed a motion for reconsideration of the denial of its motion to dismiss. In the interests of justice I will deny the plaintiff’s motion and will deem defendants’ answer to have been filed with leave of court. In the future defendants are warned that failure to comply strictly with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may not be met with such lenience. I will also deny the motion to reconsider. I continue to believe my conclusions in the order were correct. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for clerk’s default [45] and the motion to reconsider [48] are denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the answer filed on July 28, 2017 is deemed timely filed with leave of Court. ______________________________ CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 2nd day of August, 2017. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?