Justus v. Stamps et al

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to Accept Relevant Evidence of Exhaustion [Doc. 9] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's exhibits attached to Docket No. 9 shall be returned to plaintiff as the Court does not accept discovery documents unless they are filed as attachments to motions for relief.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 1/8/18. (Exhibits returned to plaintiff)(LGK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION HARRY JUSTUS, JR., Plaintiff, v. DR. RUANNE STAMPS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:17-CV-80 SPM MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to “Accept Relevant Evidence of Exhaustion” in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This Court does not accept discovery documents such as these unless they are attached to motions for relief, such as those brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Court will instruct the Clerk to return the documents to plaintiff, as well as any additional discovery documents sent to the Court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to “Accept Relevant Evidence of Exhaustion” [Doc. #9] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s exhibits attached to Docket No. 9 shall be returned to plaintiff as the Court does not accept discovery documents unless they are filed as attachments to motions for relief. SHIRLEY PADMORE MENSAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated this 8th day of January, 2018.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?