Cook v. Godert et al

Filing 40

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 34 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have an additional thirty (30) days from the date of this order in which to submit his response to defendant Lockharts motion to dismiss. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 11/19/2020. (SMM)

Download PDF
Case: 2:20-cv-00024-SRC Doc. #: 40 Filed: 11/19/20 Page: 1 of 1 PageID #: 338 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES COOK, Plaintiff, v. LUKENDRA LOCKHAR, et al., Defendants, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:20-cv-00024-SRC MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the motion of plaintiff James Cook for an extension of time in which to respond to defendant Lukendra Lockhart’s motion to dismiss. (Docket No. 34). In the motion, plaintiff states that he has been in segregation and unable to access his legal documents, including the motion to dismiss to which he is attempting to respond. He seeks thirty additional days to file his response. Good cause being shown, the Court finds that the motion should be granted. Plaintiff will be given thirty days from the date of this order in which to respond to defendant Lockhart’s motion to dismiss. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 34) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have an additional thirty (30) days from the date of this order in which to submit his response to defendant Lockhart’s motion to dismiss. Dated this 19th day of November, 2020. STEPHEN R. CLARK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?