Liddell, et al v. Board of Education, et al

Filing 467

OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Supplemental Suggestions in Support of the Motion to Intervene on behalf of Charter Public School Parents and Children, [Doc. No. 449 ], is denied as moot, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/15/19. (KJS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
CRATON LIDDELL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, et
al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:72CV100 HEA

OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Supplemental Suggestions in Support
of the Motion to Intervene on Behalf of Charter Public School Parents and
Children, [Doc. No. 449]. The Liddell Plaintiff Class, the Caldwell/NAACP
Plaintiff Class and the Special Administrative Board of the Transitional School
District of the City of St. Louis (“Joint Movants”) oppose the Motion.
Intervening Movants advise the Court that they seek intervention solely to
advocate against the relief sought in the Motion to Enforce Settlement filed in
April 2016. On March 26, 2019, the Court granted the Motion to Strike this
Motion. To date, Plaintiffs have not refiled the Motion to Enforce. As such, the
Motion to Intervene as of Right is now moot.

Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Supplemental Suggestions in Support of
the Motion to Intervene on behalf of Charter Public School Parents and Children,
[Doc. No. 449], is denied as moot, without prejudice.
Dated this 15th day of July, 2019.

___________________________________
HENRY EDWARD AUTREY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

[2]