Jennings v. Groose

Filing 32

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Petitioner asks me to reconsider my March 31, 2015, Memorandum and Order denying in part and dismissing in part his motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As petitioner makes no l egal or factual arguments convincing me that my prior decision was in error, the motion to alter or amend judgment will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to alter or amend the judgment [#31] is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 04/23/2015. (CBL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
MARVIN JENNINGS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Petitioner,
vs.
MICHAEL GROOSE,
Respondent.

Case No. 4:94CV1349 CDP

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Petitioner asks me to reconsider my March 31, 2015, Memorandum and
Order denying in part and dismissing in part his motion for relief from judgment
under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As petitioner makes no
legal or factual arguments convincing me that my prior decision was in error, the
motion to alter or amend judgment will be denied.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to alter or amend the
judgment [#31] is denied.

_______________________________
CATHERINE D. PERRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 23rd day of April, 2015.