Berkley v. New World Pasta
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 1 be DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to pay the $250.00 filing fee. FURTHER ORDERED that, if plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee within thirty (30) days, the Court will dismiss this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/21/06. (KLH, )
Berkley v. New World Pasta
Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JACQUELINE J. BERKLEY, Plaintiff, v. NEW WORLD PASTA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 4:06-CV-470-CEJ
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court upon the application of Jacqueline J. Berkley for leave to commence this action without payment of the required filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Upon review of plaintiff's financial affidavit, the Court will deny her leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Financial Affidavit In plaintiff's financial affidavit, she states that (1) she is employed by New World Pasta and earns a monthly income of $2,368.00; (2) her spouse is employed and earns a monthly income of $2,400.001; (3) in the past 12 months, she has received no "other income"; (4) she currently has $200.00 in cash on hand or money in a savings or checking account; (5) she has property consisting of a 1999 Jeep valued at $7,000.00, a 2002 PT Cruiser valued at $8.000.00 and a home valued at $57,000.00; (6) she has no dependents; (7) her debts consist of a mortgage ($597.31 per
The Court notes that, in Lee v. McDonald's Corporation, 231 F.3d 456 (8th Cir. 2000), the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that plaintiff's in forma pauperis status was to be based upon his financial status, independent of his wife's assets, to which she had denied him access. In the case at hand, it is unclear whether plaintiff has access to her husband's monthly income. Regardless, plaintiff's financial information alone is sufficient to deny her leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Page 2 of 3
month/$57,000.00 total debt), a student loan ($324.00 per month/$10,000.00 total debt) and other loans and/or credit card debt ($303.00 per month/$13,600.00 total debt). Discussion Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) provides, in pertinent part, that "[a]ny court of the United States may authorize the commencement . . . of any suit . . . without payment of fees or security therefor, by a person who makes affidavit . . . that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor." This statutory provision guarantees that no citizen shall be denied access to the federal courts "solely because . . . poverty makes it impossible . . . to pay or secure the costs" of litigation. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 342 (1948). The decision to grant or deny in forma pauperis status is within the discretion of the district court. Cross v. General Motors Corp., 721 F.2d 1152, 1157 (8th Cir. 1983). Upon consideration of the financial information provided with the application, the Court finds that plaintiff is financially able to pay the filing fee of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250.00). See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 1] be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to pay the $250.00 filing fee.2
The Court notes that if plaintiff pays the filing fee, she will be responsible for serving the summons and the complaint upon the defendant, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c), or requesting the defendant to waive service of summons. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Plaintiff is advised that she may seek guidance on serving the defendant from the Office of the Clerk. 2
Page 3 of 3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee within thirty (30) days, the Court will dismiss this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Dated this 21st day of March, 2006.
_________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?