Walker v. Superintendent et al
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #1] is PROVISIONALLY GRANTED, subject to modification by the Western District of Missouri upon transfer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issueupon the complaint because it is being transferred to the Western District of Missouri. An appropriate order shall accompany this order and memorandum.So Ordered this 26th Day of April, 2006. Signed by Judge E. Richard Webber on 4/26/2006. (JMW, )
Walker v. Superintendent et al
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TYRONE WALKER, Plaintiff, vs. SUPT. FULTON CORR. CENTER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 4:06CV00647 ERW
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM This matter is before the Court upon the application of Tyrone Walker for leave to commence this action without payment of the required filing fee. See U.S.C. § 1915(a). Upon consideration of the financial information provided with the application, the Court will grant applicant provisional leave to file this action in forma pauperis. The Court will also order that this complaint be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The Complaint Plaintiff, a prisoner currently confined at the Eastern Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center ("ERDCC"), seeks monetary and other relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff's claims arise from his confinement at the Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center ("FRDC"). Named as defendants are "Supt. Fulton Corr. Center," and "C.M.S., Medical Service." Plaintiff asserts claims for medical negligence relative to treatment he has received for a burst appendix. Discussion Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), venue for this action is proper where (i) any defendant resides, if all the defendants reside in the same state; (ii) a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred; or (iii) where any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. All of the events described in the complaint occurred either at the FRDC in Callaway County, Missouri or in Jefferson City, Missouri which is located in
Page 2 of 2
Cole County, Missouri within the territorial jurisdiction of the Western District of Missouri. See 28 U.S.C. § 105(b)(4). Thus, all of the defendants can be found and the events giving rise to this claim occurred in the Western District of Missouri. Therefore, venue is not proper in this district. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the District Court in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong district may dismiss the case or, in the exercise of its discretion and in the interest of justice, transfer the complaint to any District Court in which such action could have been brought. In cases involving a plaintiff who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, especially a prisoner, the usual practice is to transfer the case to the proper district. Therefore, this complaint shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Because venue is not proper in this district, no determination has been made as to whether the complaint is frivolous or fails to state a claim, or both, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A)(B). In accordance with the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #1] is PROVISIONALLY GRANTED, subject to modification by the Western District of Missouri upon transfer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint because it is being transferred to the Western District of Missouri. An appropriate order shall accompany this order and memorandum. So Ordered this 26th Day of April, 2006.
_________________________________ E. RICHARD WEBBER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?