Tilda Ltd v. Riceland Foods, Inc. et al

Filing 94

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions [#92 in 4:07CV457], [#131in 4:07CV1211], [#36 in 4:08CV499] to compel production of sworn depositiontestimony from Schafer, et al. v. Riceland Foods, Inc., et al. are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion [#1047 in 4:06MD1811] to compel Riceland Foods, Inc. to produce hedging information is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 2/20/09. Associated Cases: 4:06-md-01811-CDP, 4:07-cv-00457-CDP, 4:07-cv-01211-CDP, 4:08-cv-00499-CDP(RJD)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE GENETICALLY MODIFIED RICE LITIGATION This Order Relates to: Tilda Ltd. v. Riceland, Veetee Rice Ltd. v. Riceland, Rickmers Reismuhle GmbH v. Riceland,

) ) )

Case No. 4:06MD1811 CDP

Case No. 4:07CV0457 CDP Case No. 4:07CV1211 CDP Case No. 4:08CV0499 CDP

ORDER For reasons stated on the record during the status conference held on February 19, 2009, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions [#92 in 4:07CV457], [#131 in 4:07CV1211], [#36 in 4:08CV499] to compel production of sworn deposition testimony from Schafer, et al. v. Riceland Foods, Inc., et al. are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion [#1047 in 4:06MD1811] to compel Riceland Foods, Inc. to produce hedging information is DENIED.

CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 20th day of February, 2009.