Clark v. Smith

Filing 5

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 3 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 7/31/07. (TRC)

Download PDF
Clark v. Smith Doc. 5 Case 4:07-cv-01357-JCH Document 5 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CALVIN K. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. PAT SMITH, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:07-CV-1357 (JCH) ORDER The matter is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel, filed July 27, 2007. (Doc. No. 3). Petitioner filed his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 cause of action on July 27, 2007. (Doc. No. 1). There is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil case. Nelson v. Redfield Lithograph Printing, 728 F.2d 1003, 1004 (8th Cir. 1984). In determining whether to appoint counsel, courts consider factors that include whether the petitioner has presented nonfrivolous allegations supporting his prayer for relief, whether the petitioner will substantially benefit from the appointment of counsel, whether there is a need to further investigate and present the facts related to the petitioner's allegations, and whether the factual and legal issues presented by the action are complex. See Battle v. Armontrout, 902 F.2d 701, 702 (8th Cir. 1990); Johnson v. Williams, 788 F.2d 1319, 1322-23 (8th Cir. 1986); Nelson, 728 F.2d at 1005. After considering Petitioner's motion in view of the relevant factors, the Court finds that the facts and legal issues presented in the instant case are not so complex as to warrant the appointment -1- Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:07-cv-01357-JCH Document 5 Filed 07/31/2007 Page 2 of 2 of counsel at this time. In addition, the pleadings, and subsequent motions, filed by Petitioner indicate that he is capable of presenting the facts and legal issues without the assistance of counsel. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED. Dated this 31st day of July, 2007. /s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?