Morris v. Doyle et al

Filing 36

ORDER re 35 ORDERED that Plaintiff Franklin Morris' Motion for Leave to FileAmended Complaint, Pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Motion to Defer Dispositive Rulings Pending Filing of Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 35) is DENIED.. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 1/13/09. (CEL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION FRANKLIN MORRIS, Plaintiff(s), vs. LT. LARRY DOYLE, et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Franklin Morris' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, Pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Motion to Defer Dispositive Rulings Pending Filing of Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, filed January 12, 2009. (Doc. No. 35). Under the Case Management Order issued in this case (Doc. No. 15), all motions for amendment of pleadings were to be filed by June 12, 2008. Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23) and Plaintiff filed his response thereto (Doc. Nos. 28, 30). Plaintiff's Motion, therefore, is untimely. In addition, Plaintiff failed to file a proposed amended complaint with his Motion. This court cannot determine whether amendment of the pleadings would be in the interest of justice when Plaintiff has not provided the proposed amended complaint. Upon consideration, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion. Case No. 4:07CV1629JCH Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Franklin Morris' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, Pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Motion to Defer Dispositive Rulings Pending Filing of Amended Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 35) is DENIED. Dated this 13th day of January, 2009. /s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?