Vutek, Inc. v. Leggett & Platt, Incorporated et al

Filing 153

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motion to vacate the July 14, 2009 Order [#152] is granted, and the Memorandum and Order entered in this case on July 14, 2009 [docket entry # 136] is VACATED.Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on November 12, 2009. (MCB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION VUTEK, INC., Plaintiff, vs. LEGGETT & PLATT, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:07CV1886 CDP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The parties have informed the court that they have resolved all issues in this case, and have indicated that their settlement is based in part on an agreement that defendant/counterclaim-plaintiffs Leggett & Platt, Inc. and L & P Property Management Company ask this Court to vacate the July 14, 2009 order in which I found that certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,290,874 were invalid. Although I would not vacate a final judgment in order to facilitate a settlement, the order in this case is not final, because many issues in the case remain for resolution. Additionally, vacating this order will have no effect on the final determination in an earlier case of invalidity of certain claims of the predecessor patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,755,518. See Leggett & Platt, Inc. v. Vutek, Inc., 537 F.3d 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2008). Because the July 14, 2009 order is interlocutory, and because the parties to this litigation are jointly asking me to vacate it, I will do so. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motion to vacate the July 14, 2009 Order [#152] is granted, and the Memorandum and Order entered in this case on July 14, 2009 [docket entry # 136] is VACATED. _______________________________ CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 12th day of November, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?