United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Mosley Construction, Inc. et al

Filing 38

ORDER re 37 ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Additional Time to Respond tto Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 37) is GRANTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file their response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment no later than May 15, 2009, and Plaintiff shall file its Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on or before May 25, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other dates in the original case management order shall remain the same.. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 5/7/09. (CEL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Plaintiff(s), vs. MOSLEY CONSTRUCTION, et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court upon Defendants Kem and Karen Mosley's Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment, filed May 6, 2009. (Doc. No. 37). Upon consideration, the Court will grant the Defendants' motion in part. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Additional Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 37) is GRANTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file their response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment no later than May 15, 2009, and Plaintiff shall file its Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on or before May 25, 2009. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other dates in the original case management order shall remain the same. Dated this 7th day of May, 2009. Case No. 4:08CV0047 JCH /s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?