Westfall v. Steele
Filing 22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : In summary, petitioner has failed to establish that the state courts decisions on his claims were contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, or based upon an unreasonable determination of t he facts in light of the evidence presented in state court proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997).. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 2/15/11. (KKS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
