Ginsburg et al v. INBEV NV/SA et al

Filing 170

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Rule 60 Motion for Relief from August 3 Order 167 is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 9/18/09. (TRC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION GINSBURG, et al., Plaintiff(s), vs. INBEV NV/SA, et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Rule 60 Motion for Relief from August 3 Order. (Doc. No. 167). This matter is fully briefed and ready for disposition. In their Motion, Plaintiffs seek clarification regarding whether Plaintiffs' complaint adequately requested divestiture of Defendants' merger. This Court granted Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings because it found that Plaintiffs did not properly set forth a plausible claim for relief. (Doc. No. 158). The Court did not reach the issue of whether Plaintiffs had adequately pled their prayer for relief. Therefore, this Court finds no basis under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) to grant Plaintiffs' Motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Rule 60 Motion for Relief from August 3 Order (Doc. No. 167) is DENIED.

Case No. 4:08CV1375 JCH

Dated this 18th day of September, 2009.

/s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE