Roe et al v. St. Louis University

Filing 101

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Joan Roe's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in which to Produce 90 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Saint Louis University's Renewed Motion for Sanctions 94 is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 11/10/09. (TRC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JOAN ROE, Plaintiff(s), vs. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Joan Roe's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in which to Produce (Doc. No. 90) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Saint Louis University's Renewed Motion for Sanctions (Doc. No. 94) is DENIED without prejudice.

Case No. 4:08CV1474 JCH

Dated this 10th day of November, 2009.

/s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE