Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The St. Louis Rams Partnership et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against defendant The St. Louis Rams Partnership, The Rams Football Company, Inc. and ITB Football Company, L.L.C., d/b/a St. Louis Rams Jury Demand,, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Original Filing Form, # 3 Waiver of Service)(Shelly, Jan)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE ST. LOUIS RAMS PARTNERSHIP, ) THE RAMS FOOTBALL COMPANY, INC., ) and ITB FOOTBALL COMPANY, L.L.C. ) d/b/a ST. LOUIS RAMS, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________________ ) COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of disability and to provide appropriate relief to Ron DuBuque, who was adversely affected by such practices. The Commission alleges that The St. Louis Rams Partnership, The Rams Football Company, Inc., and ITB Football Company, L.L.C. d/b/a the St. Louis Rams terminated the employment of Ron DuBuque because of his disability, Epilepsy. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 451, 1331, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT Jury Trial Demanded 1337, 1343, and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a), which incorporates by reference Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3), and pursuant to Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981. 2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission"), is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title I of the ADA and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 107(a) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a), which incorporates by reference Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3). 4. At all relevant times, Defendant, The St. Louis Rams Partnership, has continuously been a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of Missouri and has continuously had at least fifteen (15) employees; Defendant, The Rams Football Company, Inc., has continuously been a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of Missouri and has continuously had at least fifteen (15) employees; and Defendant ITB Football Company, L.L.C., has continuously been a Missouri Limited Liability Corporation doing business in the State of Missouri and has continuously had at least fifteen (15) employees. 5. At all relevant times, Defendants have continuously been employers in an industry affecting commerce under Section 101(5) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §12111(5), and 2 Section 101(7) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12111(7), which incorporates by reference Sections 701(g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e(g) and (h). 6. At all relevant times, Defendants have been covered entities under Section 101(2) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12111(2). STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 7. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Ron DuBuque filed a charge with the Commission alleging violations of Title I of the ADA by Defendants. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 8. Since at least June 2006, Defendants have engaged in unlawful employment practices at its St. Louis, Missouri location, in violation of Section 102(a) and (b) of Title I of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a) and (b), by terminating the employment of Ron DuBuque because of his disability, Epilepsy. 9. The effect of these actions by Defendants has been to deprive Ron DuBuque of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee because of his disability. 10. intentional. 11. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 8, above, were The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 8, above, were done with malice or reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Ron DuBuque. 3 WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendants, their officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with them, from engaging in any employment practice that discriminates on the basis of disability; B. Order Defendants to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs that provide equal employment opportunities for qualified individuals with disabilities, and that eradicate the effects of their past and present unlawful employment practices; C. Order Defendants to make Ron DuBuque whole by providing appropriate back pay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, reinstatement and all benefits and seniority associated therewith or front pay in lieu of reinstatement, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of their unlawful employment practices; D. Order Defendants to make Ron DuBuque whole by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in Paragraph 8 above in amounts to be determined at trial; E. Order Defendants to make Ron DuBuque whole by providing compensation for past and future nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful practices described in Paragraph 8, above, including compensation for emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment of life, damage to reputation, and humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial; F. Order Defendants to pay Ron DuBuque punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct, as described in paragraph 8, above, in amounts to be determined at trial; G. interest; and Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public 4 H. Award the Commission its costs incurred in this action. JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its Complaint. Respectfully submitted, RONALD S. COOPER General Counsel JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel /s/ Barbara A. Seely BARBARA A. SEELY Regional Attorney /s/ Jan Shelly________ JAN SHELLY MO #42085 Senior Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION St. Louis District Office Robert A. Young Federal Bldg. 1222 Spruce St., Room 8.100 St. Louis, MO 63103 (314) 539-7918 jan.shelly@eeoc.gov 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?