Allen v. ASRC Communication, LTD et al

Filing 113

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 102 MOTION to Dismiss Party filed by Defendant Chengega Tech Services, Corp., 103 MOTION to Dismiss Party filed by Defendant ASRC Communication, LTD are granted. It is further ordered that defts. Chenega Technology Services Corp. and ASRC Communications are dismiss with prejudice from this action. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 4/7/10. (CLA)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ALICE ALLEN, Plaintiff, vs. ASRC COMMUNICATION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 4:08CV1575 HEA

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants Chenega Technology Services Corporation, (CTSC), and ASRC Communications, LTD's (ASRC) Motions to Dismiss, [Doc. Nos. 102 and 103, respectively]. For the reasons set forth below, the Motions are granted. On August 14, 2009, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike which included a request to strike Defendants CTSC and ASRC from all counts of her Complaint. The Court granted the Motion to Strike on August 17, 2009. Because there were no remaining allegations against Defendants CTSC and ASRC, these defendants filed a Motion on September 8, 2009 asking that they be dismissed from this case entirely. The Court granted these Motions on February 19, 2010. They now ask to be dismissed with prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Chenega Technology Services Corporation and ASRC Communications' Motions to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 102 and 103], are granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Chenega Technology Services Corporation and ASRC Communications are dismissed with prejudice from this action. Dated this 7th day of March, 2010.

______________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-