Day et al v. Robinwood West Community Improvement District

Filing 9

ORDER re 7 , 4 ORDERED that Defendant's motion (Doc. #7) for an extension of time to file an answer is GRANTED in part, such that Defendant shall haveup to and including January 12, 2009, to file an answer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the part ies shall confer with regard to Plaintiffs' motion for limited expedited discovery (Doc. #4). In the event the parties are unable to reach an agreement with regard to Plaintiffs' motion, Defendant shall also have until January 12, 2009, to respond to Plaintiffs' motion for expedited discovery. ( Response to Court due by 1/12/2009.). Signed by Mag Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/29/08. (CEL)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF MISSOURI E A S T E R N DIVISION

N O E L A. DAY, et al., Plaintiffs vs. R O B I N W O O D WEST COMMUNITY IM P R O V E M E N T DISTRICT, INC., Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER

C as e No. 4:08CV1888 AGF

I T IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion (Doc. #7) for an e x t e n s io n of time to file an answer is GRANTED in part, such that Defendant shall have u p to and including January 12, 2009, to file an answer. I T IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall confer with regard to P lain tiff s' motion for limited expedited discovery (Doc. #4). In the event the parties are u n a b le to reach an agreement with regard to Plaintiffs' motion, Defendant shall also have u n til January 12, 2009, to respond to Plaintiffs' motion for expedited discovery.

Audrey G. Fleissig AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE D a te d this 29th day of December, 2008