McCormick v. Johnston et al

Filing 20

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. McCormick to SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not construe his failure to timely respond to motion to dismiss as an admission of the merits of the motion and dismiss his claims. Failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of action for lack of prosecution. Show Cause Response due by 10/14/2008. Signed by Chief Judge David R Herndon on 10-1-08. (anj)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MATTHEW MCCORMICK, Plaintiff, v. REV. ROBERT JOHNSTON, and THE CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. LOUIS, a religious corporation, Defendant. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HERNDON, Chief Judge: This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Doc. 9) filed by the Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis on August 13, 2008. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), Plaintiff'`s response was due 30 days after the motion to dismiss was filed, but 30 days have passed and Plaintiff has not responded. The Court may, in its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the motion. Local Rule 7.1(c). Therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff, Matthew McCormick, to SHOW CAUSE on or before Tuesday, October 14, 2008, why the Court should not construe his failure to timely respond to the motion to dismiss as an admission of the merits of the motion and dismiss his claims against the Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis. Failure to respond in a timely manner to this order may result in No. 08-00559-DRH dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the Court's inherent authority to manage its docket. See In re Bluestein & Co., 68 F.3d 1022, 1025 (7th Cir. 1995). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 1st day of October, 2008. /s/ DavidRHer|do| Chief Judge United States District Court Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?