Clockwork Home Services, Inc. et al v. Pascale

Filing 27

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss Case or transfer filed by Defendant Angelo Pascale. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Pascale's motion to dismiss [#12] is denied and his motion to transfer [#12] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERE D that the Clerk of Court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant sare hereafter prohibited from (1) moving to change venue; (2) moving to dismiss for improper venue; or (3) seeking to foreclose plaintiffs from asserting claims against them on the grounds that the Member Agreement requires that the action be brought in Missouri. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on Pascal e by mailing it to him at each of the addresses shown on his various filings. Terminate Case. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on April 15, 2009. (copy mailed this date to: Angelo Pascale, Abra-Cadabra Plumbing & Heating, 25 Pine St. #1, Rock away, NJ 07866; Angelo Pascale, Abra-Cadabra Plumbing & Heating, 5 Park Lake Avenue, Unit #3, Sparta, NJ 07871; Angelo Pascale, Abra-Cadabra Plumbing & Heating, P.O. Box 986, Sparta, NJ 07870-0986; and Angel Pascale, Abra-Cadabra Pluming & Heating, 15 Ponderosa Trail, Sparta, NJ 07871)(MCB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CLOCKWORK HOME SERVICES, INC. et al., Plaintiffs, vs. ANGELO PASCALE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:09CV142 CDP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Defendant Angelo Pascale sent a letter to this court on March 9, 2009 asking that I transfer this case to either New York or New Jersey, and that I dismiss him, as an individual, from the case because his company is the proper party. At my direction, the Clerk of Court docketed that as a motion to dismiss or transfer venue. Plaintiffs filed a memorandum opposing the motion. On March 24, 2009, I ordered Pascale to file a brief setting out the legal and factual support for his motions. That order was sent to Pascale at the address provided in his letter, but was returned to the court as undeliverable. Pascale has not informed the court of any change of address, as required by the local rules. Pascale must have received the order somehow, however, because he sent a second letter to the court, which appears to be a response to the order. The letter did not contain any certificate of service or any other indication that he had served it on plaintiffs' counsel, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. Further, the letter did not give any factual or legal support for his motion to dismiss or to transfer venue. Nor did it address plaintiffs' claim that Pascale consented to venue in this court when he signed the Member Agreement. There is no basis for dismissing the suit against Pascale. Indeed, it appears that plaintiffs will easily be able to prove that Pascale treated any corporate entities ­ if they even exist ­ as alter egos of himself, although that, of course, is a fact issue not yet ripe for determination. Plaintiffs have indicated that they would agree to a transfer this case to the Unites States District Courts for the Southern District of New York or the District of New Jersey, provided that defendants are barred from later challenging venue. Plaintiffs have attempted to contact Pascale to work out a consent motion to transfer, but Pascale has not responded. While Pascale has not supported his motion to transfer with a brief, as I requested, I find that transfer of the case to the District of New Jersey is in the interests of justice, because that will be more convenient for the parties and witnesses. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). This is especially so here, because it appears that Pascale may end up representing himself, since he claims he has been unable to hire counsel. As my previous orders explained, he cannot represent the corporations, but if he is representing himself he will need to appear at court -2- scheduling conferences and hearings. Plaintiffs' counsel are located in New York, and any judgment would have to be collected in New Jersey. I will therefore transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, but I will order that defendants comply with the conditions set by plaintiffs, specifically, following transfer, defendants may not move to (1) change venue; (2) dismiss for improper venue; or (3) foreclose plaintiffs from asserting claims against them on the grounds that the Member Agreement requires that the action be brought in Missouri. If defendants fail to comply with these conditions, plaintiffs could file a motion to transfer the case back here, and by this Order I urge the District of New Jersey to grant such a motion. My hope, of course, is that Pascale, having gotten what he asked for, will not allow the corporate defendants to breach the conditions set out above. Pascale is reminded of his obligation to follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and is specifically reminded that he has a duty to keep the court apprised of his current address, and to serve plaintiffs' counsel with a copy of anything he provides to the court. Pascale is advised that any further failure to comply with these rules may result in the imposition of sanctions. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Pascale's motion to dismiss [#12] is denied and his motion to transfer [#12] is granted. -3- IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants are hereafter prohibited from (1) moving to change venue; (2) moving to dismiss for improper venue; or (3) seeking to foreclose plaintiffs from asserting claims against them on the grounds that the Member Agreement requires that the action be brought in Missouri. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on Pascale by mailing it to him at each of the addresses shown on his various filings. CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 15th day of April, 2009. -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?