Payne v. KCI USA, Inc. et al

Filing 17

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay in this action is CONTINUED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of any decision in the arbitration, or by June 2, 2011, whichever comes first, the parties shall file a joint statement reporting on the progress of the arbitration, and indicating whether the stay should continue. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 12/2/10. (CLA)

Download PDF
Payne v. KCI USA, Inc. et al Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION RONALD E. PAYNE, Plaintiff(s), vs. KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC., et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court upon its review of the record. On June 29, 2009, the Court ordered this matter stayed pending arbitration. (Doc. No. 12). The Court further ordered that within ten (10) days of any decision in the arbitration, or by January 8, 2010, whichever came first, the parties were to file a joint statement reporting on the progress of the arbitration, and indicating whether the stay should continue. (Id.). On February 17, 2010, the Court continued the stay until August 13, 2010. (Doc. No. 14). The parties filed a status report on December 2, 2010, requesting that the stay in this matter be continued until sometime after the arbitration hearing can be reset. (Doc. No. 16). Upon consideration, the Court will grant the parties' request. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay in this action is CONTINUED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of any decision in the arbitration, or by June 2, 2011, whichever comes first, the parties shall file a joint statement reporting on the progress of the arbitration, and indicating whether the stay should continue. Dated this 2nd day of December, 2010. /s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 4:09CV496 JCH Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?