HOWARD v. HASKINS et al

Filing 28

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this order of dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 11/13/09. (KXS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DERRICK HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY HASKINS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:09CV850 CEJ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff brings this action asserting claims of fraud, conversion and breach of fiduciary duty. In the complaint, plaintiff asserts that jurisdiction is premised on diversity of citizenship. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: "If the court determines at any time that it lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action." Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Terre Haute, Indiana. Prior to his incarceration, plaintiff was a resident of Missouri. See Complaint, p. 3; United States v. Howard, 4:04CR113 JCH (E.D. Mo.). Plaintiff, therefore, is a resident of Missouri. See White v. Fawcett Publications, 324 F. Supp. 403, 404 (W.D. Mo. 1971) ("Ordinarily, the citizenship of a prisoner remains in the State of which he was a citizen before his imprisonment."). The majority of the defendants in this action reside in Missouri. Therefore, diversity jurisdiction does not exist. Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) (28 U.S.C. § 1332 requires "complete diversity"). The Court must dismiss the action for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this order of dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 13th day of November, 2009. CAROL E. JACKSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?