McKenna v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
Filing
24
ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for extension of time [# 23 ] to respond to defendants Apple Inc.'s and DAngelo Automotive's motions to dismiss is granted, and his response to these motions is now due on November 13, 2009. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 10/30/09. (KLH)
<![CDATA[
McKenna v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
Doc. 24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
GREGORY MCKENNA, Plaintiff, vs. ST. LOUIS COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 4:09CV1113 CDP
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for extension of time [#23] to respond to defendants Apple Inc.'s and D'Angelo Automotive's motions to dismiss is granted, and his response to these motions is now due on November 13, 2009.
CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 30th day of October, 2009.
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
