McKenna v. St. Louis County Police Department et al

Filing 81

ORDER of USCA USCA Appeal #: 10-2277. Appellant's request for disclosure of the names of judges voting aginst appellant's petition for rehearing en banc has been considered by the court and is denied. Appellant's petition for rehearing en banc was submitted to the court, and no judge called for a vote on the petition. Judge Gruender did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. (BAK)

Download PDF
McKenna v. St. Louis County Police Department et al Doc. 81 ß°°»´´¿¬» Ý¿-»æ ïðóîîéé п¹»æ ï Ü¿¬» Ú·´»¼æ ïîñîïñîðïð Û²¬®§ ×Üæ íéíéðíé UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No: 10-2277 Gregory Michael McKenna Appellant v. St. Louis County Police Department, et al. Appellees ______________________________________________________________________________ Appeal from U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis (4:09-cv-01113-CDP) ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER Appellant's request for disclosure of the names of judges voting against appellant's petition for rehearing en banc has been considered by the court and is denied. Appellant's petition for rehearing en banc was submitted to the court, and no judge called for a vote on the petition. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and (f). Judge Gruender did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter December 21, 2010 Order Entered at the Direction of the Court: Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. ____________________________________ /s/ Michael E. Gans Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?