Carpenters' District Council Of Greater St. Louis and Vicinity et al v. AG Energy Resources, Inc.

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion to compel is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 15) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appropriate representative of Defendant AG Energy Resources, Inc., shall appear for a post-judgm ent deposition and produce the records requested in the September 20, 2012 Notice of Rule 69 Deposition and Request for Production of Documents, on Tuesday, November 27, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., at the office of Plaintiffs counsel, Hammond and Shinners, P.C., 7730 Carondelet, Suite 200, St. Louis, MO 63105. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Order to AG Energy Resources, Inc., 404 West Reed Street, Benton, IL 62812. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure of Defendant to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions against AG Energy Resources, Inc., and/or a corporate officer, which may include a fine and/or incarceration.(Response to Court due by 11/27/2012.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/23/2012. (KSM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CARPENTERS’ DISTRICT COUNCIL ) OF GREATER ST. LOUIS AND ) VICINITY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) AG ENERGY RESOURCES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) Case No. 4:09CV01152 AGF MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to compel post-judgment discovery. By default judgment dated October 20, 2009, the Court entered default judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant in the total amount of $12,731.38, based on delinquent contributions to benefit plans under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. (Doc. No. 12.) Plaintiffs’ memorandum in support of their motion to compel filed on October 22, 2012, and the affidavit of attorney Matthew J. Gierse attached thereto assert that to date, Plaintiffs have not been able to collect any of the judgment amounts, and that Plaintiffs sent a Notice of postjudgment deposition to Mike Kearney, an officer of Defendant, on September 20, 2012, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69. The Notice required the attendance of Mr. Kearney at the office of Plaintiffs’ counsel on October 19, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., and the production of certain documents relevant to Plaintiffs’ efforts to collect the judgment in this case. Counsel’s affidavit states that no representative of Defendant appeared at the deposition or produced any documents, nor did any representative of Defendant contact Plaintiffs’ counsel with respect to the deposition Notice. Plaintiffs now seek a Court order compelling a representative of Defendant to appear on November 27, 2012, for a post-judgment deposition in aid of execution of Plaintiffs’ judgment. This procedure is appropriate pursuant to Rule 69(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motion to compel is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 15.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appropriate representative of Defendant AG Energy Resources, Inc., shall appear for a post-judgment deposition and produce the records requested in the September 20, 2012 Notice of Rule 69 Deposition and Request for Production of Documents, on Tuesday, November 27, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., at the office of Plaintiffs’ counsel, Hammond and Shinners, P.C., 7730 Carondelet, Suite 200, St. Louis, MO 63105. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Order to AG Energy Resources, Inc., 404 West Reed Street, Benton, IL 62812. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure of Defendant to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions against AG Energy Resources, Inc., and/or a corporate officer, which may include a fine and/or incarceration. _________________________________ AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 23rd day of October , 2012. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?