Wishon v. McGuire

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ORDERED that petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 8/12/09. (KLH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT S. WISHON, Petitioner, v. JILL MCGUIRE, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:09CV01203 MLM MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition is successive and shall be summarily dismissed. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts provides that a district court shall summarily dismiss a § 2254 petition if it plainly appears that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. Petitioner was sentenced by the state court in 1983. Petitioner sought state and federal habeas relief after the conviction. See, e,g., Wishon v. Jones, No. 4:90CV1875 CEJ (E.D. Mo. November 2, 1992). The denial of petitioner's federal habeas petition was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on December 29, 1994. Wishon v. Jones, No. 93-1247 (8th Cir. December 29, 1994). To the extent that petitioner seeks to relitigate claims that he brought in his original petition, those claims must be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(1). To the extent that petitioner seeks to bring new claims for habeas relief, petitioner must obtain leave from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit before he can bring those claims in this Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Petitioner has not been granted leave to file a successive habeas petition in this Court. As a result, the petition shall be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. So Ordered this 12th Day of August, 2009. E. RICHARD WEBBER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?