Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v. Cassity et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that American Stock Transfer Company will produce its designated Rule 30(b)(6) witness, Herbert Lenner, for deposition at the offices of Reilly Pozner, LLP, 1900 Sixteenth Street, Suite 1700, Denver, Colorado 80202, on June 5, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. MST. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on May 20, 2014. (MCB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
JO ANN HOWARD &
ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al.,
J. DOUGLAS CASSITY, et al.,
Case No. 4:09CV01252 ERW
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the court upon Plaintiffs’ and Defendant American Stock
Transfer Company’s (“American Stock Transfer”) request for a teleconference to discuss
scheduling American Stock Transfer’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition.
On May 19 and 20, 2014, the Court conducted the requested teleconference, with the
parties participating through counsel: Dru Nielsen (appearing on behalf of plaintiffs), and Gerard
Schiano-Strain (appearing on behalf of American Stock Transfer).
During the teleconference, the parties indicated the issue before the Court concerned a
deposition scheduling dispute between Plaintiffs and American Stock Transfer regarding
production of a Rule 30(b)(6) witness for American Stock Transfer. After hearing argument
from the parties, and consideration of all the circumstances, the Court will extend the deadline in
this matter to permit this deposition to be scheduled and conducted outside of the discovery time
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that American Stock Transfer Company will produce its
designated Rule 30(b)(6) witness, Herbert Lenner, for deposition at the offices of Reilly Pozner,
LLP, 1900 Sixteenth Street, Suite 1700, Denver, Colorado 80202, on June 5, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.
Dated this 20th
day of May, 2014.
E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?