Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v. Cassity et al

Filing 2215

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Missouri Trustees' Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Opinions of Robert Hipskind [ECF No. 2158 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Missouri Trustees' Motion in Limine to Excl ude Evidence of or Reference to Their Internal Policies, Procedures, Guidelines, Manuals and Related Documents [ECF No. 2159 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Missouri Trustees' Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Opinions of Janice Sa ckley [ECF No. 2160 ] is GRANTED in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Missouri Trustees' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of or Reference to FBI Form 302 Reports [ECF No. 2163 ] is GRANTED in part, and DENIED, in p art. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Missouri Trustees' Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Pre-Need Contract Consumers, Funeral Home Owners, and NPS Marketing and Training Materials [ECF No. 2164 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that National City's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Shaun R. Hayes's Post-Allegiant Conduct [ECF No. 2166 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Missouri Trustees' Motion in Limine to Prec lude Testimony and Argument about Statutory Purpose [ECF No. 2167 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that National City's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Relating to National City Bank's Acquisition-Related Due Diligence [ECF No. [21 69]] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Missouri Trustees' Joint Motions in Limine [ECF No. 2172 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motions in Limine [ECF No. 2177 ] is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude Untimely Witnesses Disclosed by Defendant National City Bank [ECF No. 2193 ] is DENIED. (See Full Order.) Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 01/29/2015. (CBL)

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?