Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v. Cassity et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PNC Bank's Motion to Compel Production of Plaintiffs' Settlement Agreement with U.S. Bank on an Expedited Basis 2361 is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on March 23, 2015. (MCB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
JO ANN HOWARD &
ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al.,
J. DOUGLAS CASSITY, et al.,
Case No. 4:09CV01252 ERW
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on PNC Bank’s Motion to Compel Production of
Plaintiffs’ Settlement Agreement with U.S. Bank on an Expedited Basis [ECF No. 2361].
PNC Bank requests the Court compel production of Plaintiffs’ settlement agreement with
U.S. Bank to accurately determine the calculation of damages under Missouri Revised Statute
§537.060. Plaintiffs’ stated they could not produce the settlement agreement due to the
confidentiality provision included in the agreement. Hearings were held on Tuesday, March 17,
and Wednesday, March 18. The Court ordered U.S. Bank to show cause as to why the
settlement agreement should not be produced within five days. U.S. Bank asserts the strict
confidentiality provision of the agreement is an integral term of the settlement and should not be
set aside without a compelling reason. U.S. Bank contends the Court should decide first if PNC
Bank is entitled to a setoff before requiring production of the settlement agreement to protect
U.S. Bank’s right to confidentiality. In the alternative, U.S. Bank requests the agreement be
produced for in camera review.
Missouri Revised Statute § 537.060 allows a judgment against a defendant be reduced by
the amounts of settlement of other defendants liable in tort for the same injury. “A plaintiff is
entitled to only one satisfaction of the same wrong.” Sanders v. Ahmed, 364 S.W.3d 195, 213
(Mo. 2012) (discussing application of section 537.060). The liability of PNC Bank cannot be
determined without the amounts of settlement from former defendants such as U.S. Bank.
However, the confidentiality bargained for by U.S. Bank must also be protected. As such,
Plaintiffs shall disclose the settlement agreement between Plaintiffs and U.S. Bank to PNC
Bank’s counsel only. The protective order previously entered by the Court [ECF No. 793] must
be narrowly tailored to allow disclosure of the agreement and its terms only to the Court and
PNC Bank’s counsel. There is no showing that any other entity is entitled to disclosure of the
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PNC Bank’s Motion to Compel Production of
Plaintiffs’ Settlement Agreement with U.S. Bank on an Expedited Basis [ECF No. 2361] is
So Ordered this 23rd day of March, 2015.
E. RICHARD WEBBER
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?