Straeten v. Roper et al

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #9] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 1/6/2010. (RJD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY LEROY STRAETEN, Plaintiff, v. DON ROPER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:09CV1280 DJS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff's post-dismissal letter to the Court,1 as well as his motion for appointment of counsel. Plaintiff filed this action on August 11, 2009, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint seeking monetary damages, plaintiff alleged, in a conclusory fashion, among other things, that he was physically assaulted by another inmate at the direction of several of the named defendants. Plaintiff also claimed, in a conclusory fashion, that he was unlawfully placed on suicide watch, "rustled" in his cell, and verbally threatened. The Court dismissed plaintiff's case for failure to state a claim, on August 26, 2009. Plaintiff's letter was filed in case numbers 4:09CV1132 TCM and 4:09CV812. Plaintiff mentioned in his correspondence that he also wished it to be considered in the instant case. 1 In a letter, dated December 15, 2009, plaintiff informs the Court that he mailed his offender account statement in August of 2009, and he seeks reassurance that the Court, in fact, received the account statement. The Court received plaintiff's account statement on August 11, 2009, and it was not a factor in the dismissal of his case. Additionally, plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel to pursue his "case/appeal." As plaintiff's case has been dismissed and his time for appeal has passed, the Court will deny plaintiff's request. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #9] is DENIED. Dated this 6th day of January, 2010. CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?