Stork v. UPS

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 9 ORDERED that plaintiff has 20 days to amend their original complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Motion to Dismiss [Doc.No. 9] is DENIED without prejudice with leave to refile after plaintiff files their amended complaint.. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 12/31/09. (CEL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KAREN STORK, Plaintiff, v. UPS, CORPORATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:09CV01722 HEA OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on defendant UPS, Corporation's ("UPS") Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 9] pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Karen Stork has filed a response opposing defendant's motion [Doc. No. 17], to which defendant has filed a reply [Doc. No. 20]. Based on the facts within both parties' pleadings, it has become apparent to the Court that there is confusion regarding when plaintiff `s official employment status was terminated. Given the discrepancy of plaintiff's discharge date, and the grounds for defendant's Motion to Dismiss, the Court will allow plaintiff 20 days to amend their complaint to clarify the discrepancy. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff has 20 days to amend their original complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 9] is DENIED without prejudice with leave to refile after plaintiff files their amended complaint. Dated this 31st Day of December, 2009. __________________________ HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?