Olds v. Dormire

Filing 68

ORDER -......IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's "Pro Se Motion Permission Leave of Court to File Out of Time Objections to Appeal Magistrate's Order Denial of Petitioner's Immediate Discharge from Custody, 28 USC § 2243" is DENIED. denying 67 Motion for Leave to Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 7/6/2010. (MRC)

Download PDF
Olds v. Dormire Doc. 68 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT NATHANIEL OLDS, Petitioner, v. DAVE DORMIRE, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the petitioner's "Pro Se Motion Permission Leave of Court to File Out of Time Objections to Appeal Magistrate's Order Denial of Petitioner's Immediate Discharge from Custody, 28 U.S.C. § 2243." In his motion, petitioner seeks to appeal Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III's Order dated June 23, 2010 to the undersigned District Judge. The motion will be denied. On November 5, 2009, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Mummert pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for a report and recommendation on dispositive matters and for rulings on non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to § 636(b)(1), Magistrate Judge Mummert may "determine any pretrial matter pending before the court," with certain exceptions not applicable here. A district judge may reconsider any pretrial matter determined by a magistrate judge on a showing that the magistrate judge's order is "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(A). Petitioner has made no such showing. No. 4:09-CV-1782 CAS-TCM Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's "Pro Se Motion Permission Leave of Court to File Out of Time Objections to Appeal Magistrate's Order Denial of Petitioner's Immediate Discharge from Custody, 28 U.S.C. § 2243" is DENIED. [Doc. 67] CHARLES A. SHAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 6th day of July, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?