Geismann v. Byram Healthcare Centers, Inc.

Filing 64

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that defendant may pursue discovery of the matters at issue in the motion by way of written response to interrogatories of Geismann and Middleton. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is denied in all other respects at this time. 55 Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 3/12/12. (CLA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION RADHA GEISMANN, M.D., P.C.,, individually and on behalf of all others similarly-situated Plaintiffs, vs. BYRAM HEALTHCARE CENTERS, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:09CV1980 HEA ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Compel [Doc. #55]. The Court finds that, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that defendant may pursue discovery of the matters at issue in the motion by way of written response to interrogatories of Geismann and Middleton. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is denied in all other respects at this time. Dated this 12th day of March, 2012. HENRY EDWARD AUTREY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?