Murphy v. Social Security Administration

Filing 20

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 19 ) is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 3/17/11. (TRC)

Download PDF
Murphy v. Social Security Administration Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION REGINALD MURPHY, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:09CV02105 JCH ORDER This matter arises on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman, filed March 2, 2011. See 28 U.S.C. §636. In his report, Magistrate Judge Adelman recommends that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss Claimant's Complaint with prejudice. The parties were granted until March 16, 2011, to object to the recommendation, but to date has filed no objections. Upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 19) is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, AND INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Judgment will accompany this Order. Dated this 17th day of March, 2011. /s/ Jean C. Hamilton UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?