Smalley v. Gamache et al
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 101 is granted, and plaintiff's opposition to summary judgment shall be filed by January 17, 2013, and defendants' reply brief may be filed by January 31, 2013. No additional extensions of time will be granted to plaintiff to respond to summary judgment, and plaintiff is specifically warned that if he fails to timely respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment, then the Court will proceed to rule the summary judgment motion without any additional notice being given to plaintiff.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 12/19/12. (LGK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JAMES SMALLEY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL GAMACHE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:10CV319 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before me on plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to respond to
summary judgment. Plaintiff has already sought and obtained an extension of time to respond to
this motion, in addition to seeking numerous previous extensions of time to complete discovery.
This case was also significantly delayed when plaintiff attempted to dismiss his case but then
changed his mind. I will give plaintiff an additional thirty days to respond to summary judgment,
but this will be the last extension of time granted to plaintiff to respond to summary judgment.
Finally, plaintiff again mentions his desire to obtain some sort of relief against the correctional
facility where he is incarcerated for allegedly hindering his ability to prosecute this case. As I
have repeatedly explained in numerous prior orders, that is not this case and does not involve
these defendants.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time [#101] is
granted, and plaintiff’s opposition to summary judgment shall be filed by January 17, 2013, and
defendants’ reply brief may be filed by January 31, 2013. No additional extensions of time
will be granted to plaintiff to respond to summary judgment, and plaintiff is specifically
warned that if he fails to timely respond to defendants’ motion for summary judgment,
then the Court will proceed to rule the summary judgment motion without any additional
notice being given to plaintiff.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 19th day of December, 2012.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?