Smalley v. Gamache et al
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 54 PRO SE MOTION state intervention filed by Plaintiff James Smalley motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 12/1/2011. (RAK)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
JAMES SMALLEY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
MICHAEL GAMACHE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:10CV319 RWS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s “third motion for state intervention.” In this
motion, plaintiff again complains about his the conditions of his confinement in a Missouri state
correctional facility. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that he has been subject to retaliation,
harassment, false conduct violations, and the denial of access to the courts while in state custody.
Plaintiff also claims that he has been placed in administrative segregation and has not had
sufficient time to use the prison library.
I previously denied plaintiff’s motions because plaintiff’s allegations are not directed
toward any of the defendants. In this case, plaintiff has sued the deputy sheriff and five sheriffs
at the St. Louis City Justice Center for his alleged mistreatment while a pretrial detainee. As I
said before, these defendants are not employed by the State of Missouri and have no control or
authority over the state correctional facility where plaintiff is being housed. The Court still
cannot order the relief sought by plaintiff in this case, so the motion will be denied.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s third motion for state intervention [#54] is
denied.
RODNEY W. SIPPEL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 1st day of December, 2011.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?