Gaffigan v. AT&T Mobility, LLC

Filing 46

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Continue Stay of Case [doc. #22] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [doc. #33] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motio n to Strike Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Continue Plaintiff's Response Date [doc. #36] is GRANTED, in part. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and D ismiss shall be filed by August 6, 2010. Plaintiff's arguments in support ofstriking Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss are held in abeyance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [doc. #9] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 7/26/2010. (RJD)

Gaffigan v. AT&T Mobility, LLC

Doc. 46

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION JOHN GAFFIGAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Continue Stay of Case [doc. #22] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment [doc. #33] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Continue Plaintiff's Response Date [doc. #36] is GRANTED, in part. Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss shall be filed by August 6, 2010. Plaintiff's arguments in support of striking Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss are held in abeyance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [doc. #9] is DENIED. Dated this 26th Day of July, 2010. ____________________________________ E. RICHARD WEBBER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 4:10CV00503 ERW

Dockets.Justia.com