Inter-National Foundation Corporation v. Disney 1999 Limited Partnership et al

Filing 166

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is removed from the July 15, 2013 trial docket, and will be reset, if necessary, upon further Order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten days of the date of this Order the par ties shall either agree upon the selection of a Special Master, and submit that persons name and relevant information, including a curriculum vitae, for the Courts consideration, or the Court will appoint a Special Master after input from the parti es. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants motion for leave [#154] is granted, and the following motions of plaintiff are denied as moot: [#142, #143, #144]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs supplemental motion in limine [#156] is denied, and plaintiffs supplemental motion in limine [#157] is denied as moot based upon defendants withdrawal of these potential witnesses. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 7/10/2013. (RAK)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION INTER-NATIONAL FOUNDATION CORP., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DISNEY 1999 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. 4:10CV1565 RWS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER In accordance with the rulings made on the record during today’s hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is removed from the July 15, 2013 trial docket, and will be reset, if necessary, upon further Order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten days of the date of this Order the parties shall either agree upon the selection of a Special Master, and submit that person’s name and relevant information, including a curriculum vitae, for the Court’s consideration, or the Court will appoint a Special Master after input from the parties. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion for leave [#154] is granted, and the following motions of plaintiff are denied as moot: [#142, #143, #144]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s supplemental motion in limine [#156] is denied, and plaintiff’s supplemental motion in limine [#157] is denied as moot based upon defendants’ withdrawal of these potential witnesses. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for extension of time for closing argument [#158] is denied without prejudice. RODNEY W. SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 10th day of July, 2013. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?