James v. Social Security Administration

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Memorandum and Order issued in this case on March 2, 2011, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's application for attorney's fees is GRANTED in the amount of $491.06, payable directly to Plaintiff. [Doc. #16] Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/4/2011. (NCL)

Download PDF
James v. Social Security Administration Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION EDWARD JAMES, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 4:10CV01786 AGF MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It has come to the Court's attention that the Memorandum and Order issued in this case on March 2, 2011, on Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees misidentified Plaintiff in the caption. Accordingly that Memorandum and Order shall be vacated, and the present Memorandum and Order shall be entered in its stead. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees in the amount of $491.06, is brought pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Plaintiff is the prevailing party in his action challenging the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for Supplemental Security Income based upon disability. His request for fees is supported by appropriate documentation, and the Commissioner states that he does not object to the amount of fees sought. As the Commissioner points out, the fees must be paid directly to Plaintiff, pursuant to Ratliff v. Astrue, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Memorandum and Order issued in this case Dockets.Justia.com on March 2, 2011, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's application for attorney's fees is GRANTED in the amount of $491.06, payable directly to Plaintiff. [Doc. #16] _______________________________ AUDREY G. FLEISSIG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 4th day of March, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?