United States of America et al v. Doe Run Resources Corporation, The et al

Filing 90

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff-Intervenor Nadist, LLC's Motion and Memorandum in Support to Stay the United States' Motion for Entry and for More Time to Respond (Doc. No. 84 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at Plaintiff-Intervenor Nadist, LLC is granted until Thursday, July 7, 2011 to respond to the Joint Motion of the United States and Missouri to Enter the Proposed Consent Decree (Doc. No. 78 ). (Response to Court due by 7/7/2011). Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 6/16/11. (TRC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and,
STATE OF MISSOURI,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE DOE RUN RESOURCES
CORPORATION, THE DOE RUN
RESOURCES CORPORATION d/b/a
THE DOE RUN COMPANY, and
THE BUICK RESOURCE RECYCLING
FACILITY, LLC,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:10CV01895 JCH

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff-Intervenor Nadist, LLC’s Motion and
Memorandum in Support to Stay the United States’ Motion for Entry and for More Time to
Respond. (Doc. No. 84).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff-Intervenor Nadist, LLC’s Motion and
Memorandum in Support to Stay the United States’ Motion for Entry and for More Time to Respond
(Doc. No. 84) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff-Intervenor Nadist, LLC is granted until
Thursday, July 7, 2011 to respond to the Joint Motion of the United States and Missouri to Enter
the Proposed Consent Decree (Doc. No. 78).
Dated this 16th day of June, 2011.

/s/ Jean C. Hamilton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE