Carpenters' District Council Of Greater St. Louis and Vicinity et al v. Lava Construction Group, LLC et al.,
Filing
17
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), Plaintiffs shall show cause in writing, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants LAVA CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC, AND ELAINE M. QUEATHAM, for lack of timely service. Show Cause Response due by 7/14/2011. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 6/30/11. (CLA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
CARPENTERS’ DISTRICT COUNCIL OF
)
GREATER ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, et al.,
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
LAVA CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC,
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
)
Case No. 4:10CV2108 JCH
ORDER
Upon review of the record, the Court notes the file contains neither proof of service upon nor
entry of appearance on behalf of Defendants LAVA CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC, AND
ELAINE M. QUEATHAM. Because it does not appear that service of Plaintiffs’ First Amended
Complaint has been timely made within 120 days after the filing of the First Amended Complaint on
February 18, 2011,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m), Plaintiffs shall show cause
in writing, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed
without prejudice as to Defendants LAVA CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC, AND ELAINE M.
QUEATHAM, for lack of timely service.
Dated this 30th day of June, 2011.
/s/ Jean C. Hamilton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?